1005 Alcyon Dr Bellmawr NJ 08031
+1 484-446-2566
support@bmcpros.com
It seemed like a brilliant choice when President-elect Donald Trump nominated Jared Isaacman as NASA administrator. Commercial entrepreneurs, private astronauts, Isaacman is just the one who transformed NASA and became the catalyst for bringing humanity to the moon, Mars and beyond.
Isaacman, who sailed during the confirmation process of the Senate Commerce Committee, was chaired by Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas), voted 19 to 9.
The White House suddenly appeared, and for nominated for Isaacman. After months of confirmation, NASA returned to Square One to acquire a new leader.
Eric Berger of ARS Technica provides an explanation for the reasons. “The mark against Isaacman is his recent donation to Democrats,” he wrote. “He also expressed opposition to some of the White House proposed cuts to NASA’s scientific budget.”
But these facts were well known even before Trump nominated for Isaacman. Trump himself, before he ran for president as a Republican, donated money to Democrats and became close friends with Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Berger went on to say that a source told the publication: “With Musk’s withdrawal, his opponents have tried to punish Isaacman’s nomination within the administration.”
The idea of Isackman’s nomination is deep at six points as Musk and the public praised the president for giving the billionaire Rockets and electric vehicle entrepreneurs.
Trump is not used to it in his social media posts. “After a thorough review of the previous association, I hereby withdraw Jared Isaacman’s nomination to NASA,” he wrote. “I will soon announce a new nominee who will be appointed to unanimously and put the United States in space. Thank you for your concern on this matter!”
CNN reported that Isaacman’s strike was the result of a palace coup, noting that one source said: “Musk’s exit sent a faction to people in Trump’s inner circle, especially Trump Trump’s long-time supporter and White House President Sergio Gor, who advocated the installation of different nominees.”
The motivation seems dissatisfied with Musk’s huge impact on the White House and the desire to bring him to a nail or two.
Isaacman said in part: “I am very grateful to President Trump @Potus, the Senate and everyone who supports me. The past six months have been inspiring, honestly, a little excited. I have a deeper awareness of the complexity of the administration and the significant importance of political leaders.”
The idea that such a respected Isaacman, the aerospace community, is expected to navigate the entire Senate confirmation vote and can be knocked down by obscure White House bureaucrats, motivated by small matters, is outrageous.
Even Senator Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), who doesn’t like Trump’s space policy, was shocked. He posted Isaacman on his account X, “I encountered politics that hurt our country.”
“Republicans and Democrats take him as the right person in due time, holding the highest position at NASA, but that’s not enough.”
As the nomination process resets and begins to pass the Senate grinding, NASA has lasted for months of turmoil and uncertainty. Strict, cut off budget proposals certainly don’t help.
Congress supports Trump’s space policy and is unlikely to be satisfied with the president’s high pressure planning of his own nominee.
Whoever chooses to replace Isaacman as NASA administrator nominee, no matter how qualified, should face some very direct doubts. Trump’s NASA budget proposal should die upon arrival, and considering the cuts in science and technology, it is not necessarily a bad thing.
China must be trapped in political quarrels, a miracle of leadership vacuum and budget uncertainty in political quarrels. Beijing has its own space ambitions and plans to land crew members by 2030.
No need to do this. Isaacman could become a NASA administrator, deploying his business acumen and vision to lead the space agency to its greatest achievement.
Instead, the U.S. space efforts have been hit by itself
Mark R. Whittington, who often writes about space policy, published a political study on “Space Exploration,”Why is it difficult to return to the moon?” also”Moon, Mars and beyond,”,recent,”Why did the United States return to the moon?He’s on the blogCurmudgeons corner.