Donald Trump’s “early rising” and diplomatic death

On July 9, U.S. President Donald Trump was prosecuted by the International Criminal Court in the midst of an endless tragedy in which he waxed the imminent solution to the imminent resolution of his nearly eighty-year-old problem and his nearly two-year-old genocide.

“We have to solve this problem. Gaza is – it’s a tragedy, (Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu) wants to solve it, I want to solve it, and I think the other side wants to solve it. Hate, long-term hatred, but we’ll soon solve a real solution to solve a real solution.

Today’s Weekly Devil’s Dictionary definition:

solve:

Let others do what corresponds to the solution you want to see without regard to their or anyone else’s interests. The opposite is solved.

Context Comments

Trump’s language about time must not be literally seen. What does he mean when he promises “to resolve it soon?”

Once he has the key to the White House, the 2024 peace candidate promises to resolve the war in Ukraine “within 24 hours.” Not only did this happen, none of the various oral initiatives he took made progress. Now, most experts believe that when Ukraine’s military and government collapse, the war will last for years or end.

But Trump can be quick and decisive. Has he successfully adopted his “in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in of to take”, Trump biographer Michael Wolff claims that he announced several days to “eliminate” Iran’s nuclear program by discarding multiple bunker bombs?

Most serious observers believe that the current pause in hostilities following the “12-day war” is due to the demands of the Netanyahu government that began to cause serious damage to the Iranians in the course of a brief conflict. Those same observers expect peace to be broken by Israel at a more convenient moment. As long as this idea can be maintained, U.S. intervention eliminates any prospects for Iran’s nuclear program to move forward, and “peace” is likely to take place. But even U.S. intelligence seems to believe that the plan was only delayed and not destroyed. However, few Israel or the United States have abandoned the idea of achieving the ultimate goal of changing the Iranian regime.

As for Gaza, Trump’s pledge to “resolve” is particularly hollow, as most experts believe there is no basis for consensus between Israel and Hamas. Reporter Jeremy Scahill Discard the site The most obvious statement is described: “Since the July 1 announcement of Donald Trump, the Gaza ceasefire (if not in the forefront, Israel) has attempted to undermine negotiations through a worn-out approach to prevent a deal to end the war.”

The great French diplomat Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord not only advised Napoleon Bonaparte in a way that diplomacy – when used seriously – helped defend long By seeking to avoid fundamental destruction rather than bringing any kind of change, it often creates confusion. The destructive approach to U.S. foreign policy, especially over the past four centuries, can well illustrate this consequence, especially in the Middle East. Libya and Syria as example charts as trends.

Trump, unable to escape a mindset conditioned by reflexes, is now solidly integrated into American culture: “Time is money.” Americans believe that the well-known expression is the permanent pressure to act quickly on them and avoid spending too much time solving things. They apply it to businesses and politics.

When applied to the field of diplomacy, we may want to call it the doctrine of “speedyism”. If you manage things based on “early, not later”, you don’t allow yourself time to fully understand the issues you are dealing with. Unfortunately, Trump is not alone, nor is he the worst example. U.S. President George W. Bush insists on punishing Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein with a non-existent weapon of mass destruction in Operation Shock and Awe, which is worse than anything Trump has done. “We will fight them there, so we don’t have to face them in the United States of America,” Bush declared.

Another example of an outbreak is that U.S. President Joe Biden is seeking to immediately exclude Russia from the rapid network as he believes he will lower the ruble to “rubber” while refusing to refuse diplomacy while guiding British Prime Minister Boris Johnson to ensure that continued diplomatic capabilities are disrupted. His team is serious about the fact that by acting quickly, Russia will not have time to react. We now know that his calculations are wrong. As a result, more than one million people died and were invisible.

Soorism is the enemy of diplomacy, a form of traditional human communication based on the principle of taking time to understand bets and hammering solutions to conflicts that may not be resolved. The current debate on ending the Ukrainian war has been reversing the two contrasting positions. In Ukraine and transatlantic, this is a “30-day ceasefire”. 30 days are the value corresponding to early dynasty. On the Russian side, this is a check on the “root cause”. These roots go deep into the landscape and develop over time. They do not fall into any short-term time frame.

Does any other explanation need for the fact that diplomacy, which is easily observed, has become an extinct art form?

History

History develops through short or extended moments. Many students of historical, anthropological and sociology have noticed the contrast between the two extreme orientations of national or regional cultures. One extreme idea is that history can be understood as a series of dramatic events that often constitute a showdown between opposition parties or interests. In this culture, history is seen as a series of “important dates”, in which different percussion events redefine the process of history. At the opposite extreme, we find cultural privileges long. They even see the dramatic events and fundamental shifts of influence within the power structure as fragments on the radar. In their view, the weight of the historical civilizational mass develops slowly over time while maintaining a stable worldview.

Trump is accustomed to American business culture, focusing on short-term decisions, and is used to seeing future events as “quickly,” as he has revealed in all his recent comments on Gaza. In typical Trump style, apparently referring to the events that took place in 2005, his decision to withdraw its settlers from Canada at the time. “Gaza Strip. I call it Gaza Strip. One of the worst real estate deals ever. They gave up their beachfront property. It was supposed to bring peace, it didn’t bring peace. It brought the opposite. But we did a great job with Gaza. I think we’ll have some fair topics soon.”

We may see this “coming talk” because he said a few days ago, “We think we’ll get it done soon.” The conversation is cheap. But the concept of solution often assumes some kind of lasting duration, if not necessarily historians Long time. Last week was about the resolution, this week was about the conversation. This seems to be Trump’s pattern. He has boundaries on theoretical solutions such as the border wall, the conquest of Greenland’s expedition and the annexation of Canada, or the construction of the Riviera on the coast of Gaza. This makes animated dialogue, but anything similar to the solution somehow fades out of our collective memory even a project.

* (In the time of Oscar Wilde and Mark Twain, journalist Ambrose Bierce produced a series of ironic definitions, ironic definitions of common terms, illuminating their hidden meaning in real discourse. Bierce eventually collected and published it as a book and used it as a book, and he mastered his depliment in 1911, and in the continuous effort, his title was ongoing, his title was shame, and his title was ongoing effort. Fair Observer Devil Dictionary)

((Lee Thompson-Kolar Edited this. )

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of fair observers.