Democrats lost, so the media thinks election conspiracy theory is good again

The only thing more annoying than the left’s delusion slipping on social media and escaping civil discourse is that journalists tend to see these fantasies as something worthy of serious consideration.

Democratic lawmakers and activists intentionally pollute discourse among ridiculous rumors and conspiracy theories, aiming to inspire the base, juice fundraisers and promote individual “brands”, which is bad. We don’t need news anchors to play.

CNN’s Dana Bash and Jake Tapper held a segment this week to entertain President Trump’s possible attempt to remove the notion of the upcoming midterm and presidential elections.

“Governors Gavin Newsom and JB Pritzker are two closely watched Democrats who may run for president in 2028,” said the head of Cable News Speech. “Both are increasingly alerting that free and fair elections may not even happen.”

Oh, get off from it.

The governor did this not because they believed what they were saying, but because they understood that the slope played a great role in the trough. Bash is big enough to understand this, which makes her “pure problem” routine of the doe eyes irresponsible.

Bash continued: “This is the most I hear Democrats hear, it’s just the first election we’re going to be nationwide and we’re going to see the midterm. That’s: How do we know they won’t get stuck with them, I mean, this is the kind of person we hear on the Republican side, we hear Donald Truxt, but I haven’t heard the facts of 2020 and I’m not in that drive.”

She couldn’t have been so dark that she missed what she had just said: It was wrong when Trump and his Marg base questioned the election. When Democrats do that – well, they probably have a little bit!

To “discuss” the governor’s very serious concerns, Bash turned to former Obama’s senior White House adviser Dan Pfiefer, who (naturally) accepted and competed with election paranoia.

“I think we should be very worried that Donald Trump will mess up these elections,” he warned. “I think we have to prepare for everything. … I would rather prepare for the worst hope than be rooted in the worst situation Donald Trump does.”

Bash then asks Pfiefer to provide practical advice on how to “prepare” things that are primarily quarreling in a dream of resistance fever.

“The first thing is to call it up,” said former Obama aide and Pod Save America co-host. “Start talk about it now. … Let everyone know, right? Let people get fired, let people know that these things are coming, so when they happen, they’re not surprised.”

Later, Pfiefer clarified that he did not believe that the president “will cancel the election” but could choose voter intimidation tactics, such as stationing an ice field outside the voting venue. Pfiefer also suggested House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) might refuse to place Democratic members in close matches “if control of the house is threatened.”

Elsewhere on the same network, Tapper also pays homage to the government. Newsom and Pritzker passed the section to former ABC news reporter Terry Moran to explain what this might mean.

Moran said the National Guard had been deployed to places like Los Angeles, which is “without a reason, the American people see a part of the military force on the streets of our city.

Later, Tapper suggested that there might be a secret link between the National Guard deployment and the White House executive order, changing the name of the Department of Defense back to the Department of War.

Tapper blinked and said, “It’s interesting that this is because all of these National Guards are deployed to major cities, theoretically not about war.”

His guest was former Obama aide David Axelrod, “Yes. No. We have active troops now, and they are landing in American cities.”

Incredibly, after all the rhetoric and printed things about Trump’s recklessness ignoring election integrity, there are a lot of the sharpest criticisms from CNN’s criticism – bash should promote self-service democracy and legitimize the worst neuro-hard murder theory of the left-wing base.

To shout out, CNN is a network of anti-Semitic propaganda terms that were originally explicitly repurposed from Adolf Hitler’s pen, aiming to condemn the denial of denial of the 2020 presidential election results.

Here, however, we are mainstream by CNN mainstream, theorizing the baseless elections that two potential democratic presidents hope for in 2028. It is Stacey Abrams (D) again, the shameless and unapologetic elections are carefully considered and seriously, rather than ridiculed, as long as it is the Democrats who are sowing distrustful Democrats.

Anyway, what is the overall information of these CNN segments? Is it only sometimes bad to undermine trust in elections, but sometimes reasonable? Or is the news really as sensitive as “we can do this”?

If these people don’t have double standards, they don’t have standards at all.

Becket Adams is a Washington writer, tooNational News Center.

Source link