Most voters say holding signal app discussion is wrong: polls

A new poll shows that most voters say the discussion about the plan to attack the Hossi in Yemen is wrong.

The Harvard/Harris poll found that 60% believed using signals for discussion was wrong, including 73% of Democrats, 65% of independents and 43% of Republicans. The majority of voters (54%) also said they considered the incident a “big thing”, while 46% said it was an exaggeration to the incident.

The result was released in a chat message published in the Atlantic, where media editor Jeffrey Goldberg added earlier this month to several members of the national security team discussing the details of the strike. These messages reveal specific details of the attack, such as the timeline and the weapons used.

The Trump administration attempted to damage the incident, slammed the Atlantic and believed that the rebound was overstated. Trump acknowledged that National Security Advisor Mike Waltz was responsible for this, but Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said: “It has nothing to do with it.”

National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe maintained at a Senate hearing, with no confidential information being discussed in the chat.

But even some Republicans are concerned about the sensitive information discussed and the inclusion of journalists in chats.

Trump has said he would not fire anyone due to “fake news” and “witch hunting”, but the poll found that 54% believed the waltz should be fired for the incident, while 46% said it was only reprehensible.

Those who should fire the Waltz include 68% of Democrats, 53% of Independents and 41% of Republicans.

Poller Mark Penn told Hill that the public believed the incident was a mistake but questioned how long the impact on the Trump administration’s overall opinion will last.

“Obviously, the public believes that (this) is having this sensitive conversation on a private company application rather than a sensitive conversation on a government system,” he said. “I think that despite the limitations of this issue, and it may be forgotten in the coming months.”

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Monday that the government’s investigation into the incident was closed, adding that measures have been taken to ensure it does not happen again. But she did not specify what steps had been taken.

Meanwhile, a lawsuit has been filed against national security leaders, with U.S. organizations oversight argued that using signals to discuss attack plans violated the Federal Records Act. A federal judge ruled that when the attack began, the government must retain all signal communications sent between March 11 and March 15.

The poll was conducted online from March 26 to 27 of 27 of 27 of registered voters. The error margin of the total sample is 1.9 points.

Source link